The Big Denial

This site exists to name what Hyde avoids:
denial, minimization, and silence.

The greatest risk to Hyde isn't "haters" — it's the silent alumni carrying unspoken truths.

I put this site up not because I claim abuse, and I have zero involvement in any litigation. This project exists for one reason: I'm tired of a school that shifts the burden back onto the people who ask direct questions, while denying the fallout and risks that remain.

The intent here is simple — to respond to that denial, and to give space for voices that haven't been heard. Many have chosen not to speak publicly, but their silence doesn't mean the impact wasn't real.

This site is about language, accountability, and truth — not accusation. It's about free speech, perspective, and finally naming what has been ignored.

Better Together

Duncan Krebs '97

Creating a school website that only publishes positive reviews while excluding negative feedback raises several ethical concerns. By withholding negative reviews, the website presents a distorted image of the school, misleading stakeholders and undermining informed choice.

Ethical Verdict:

It is not ethically justifiable for a school to create a website that only posts positive reviews and excludes negative ones. This practice fails standards for transparency, stakeholder trust, and educational accountability.

Key Issues: Information manipulation, erosion of trust, failure to model ethical behavior, and preventing institutional improvement by excluding legitimate criticism.

Hyde Truth

The Big Denial

Posts

HydeSchoolReviews.com - Shows the Real Side of Hyde